1 Comment

Think of a self (and next to God there is nothing so eternal as a self), and then that this self gets

the notion of asking whether it might not let itself become or be made

into another. . . than itself. And yet such a despairer, whose only wish

is this most crazy of all transformations, loves to think that this change

might be accomplished as easily as changing a coat. For the immediate

man does not recognize his self, he recognizes himself only by his

dress, he recognizes (and here again appears the infinitely comic trait)

he recognizes that he has a self only by externals. There is no more

ludicrous confusion, for a self is just infinitely different from externals.

When then the whole of existence has been altered for the immediate

man and he has fallen into despair, he goes a step further, he thinks

thus, this has become his wish: "What if I were to become another,

were to get myself a new self?" Yes, but if he did become another, I

wonder if he would recognize himself again! It is related of a peasant

who came cleanly shaven to the Capital, and had made so much money

that he could buy himself a pair of shoes and stockings and still had

enough left over to get drunk on -- it is related that as he was trying

in his drunken state to find his way home he lay down in the middle of

the highway and fell asleep. Then along came a wagon, and the driver

shouted to him to move or he would run over his legs. Then the

drunken peasant awoke, looked at his legs, and since by reason of the

shoes and stockings he didn’t recognize them, he said to the driver,

"Drive on, they are not my legs." So in the case of the immediate man

when he is in despair it is impossible to represent him truly without a

touch of the comic; it is, if I may say so, a clever trick to talk in this

jargon about a self and about despair.

Expand full comment